Roulette- why you can't ever constantly win.

[DenFos]

For those of you interested in betting the dozens..A system which usually wins is this:- Await for any appearance of nos 13 - 18, then bet 1 pt on 1st doz (1-12) and 1pt on HIGH. If the dozen bet does not win then you still have a very good chance of geting your stake back. Also operate at the same time with nos 19,20,21,22,23,24 - betting 1 pt on high dozen and 1pt on LOW. This normally works over the short term as long as the Zeros keep away!!

[cyberkim]

I have a winning roulette system which I used it for over 5 years and won a lot.. I would like to give all of you a tips here: do a record for the pior 36 spins, will it averagely generate 36 numbers from 1-36 with each number shows once time? this is the trick of the game

[DannyC]

Ok, either there is some miraculous 'THING' im missing here, or nobody is taking some of the posts in this thread serious.

The day you find me even a fool proof system that works 60% of the time or more, give me a shout, until then, does this really have to continue without meaning?

I dont mean to rant, but this being a GAMBLING forum, people who are thinking of going to the casinos for the first time etc. might be reading these kind of posts, and your filling hope of 'systems' being available where they can win alot of money with almost a guarantee! Thats quite alright if, its a proven fact how soo many people lose their families, sell their houses, lose everything they rightly own which theyve earnt and worked their life for to gamble it away.

Sorry if my post seems a bit too strong, I just faithfully dont want innocent people to go down the wrong path of life, one of them being gambling.

[croup]

Danny is 100% right. Roulette cannot be consistently beaten without foulplay. FACT. There is no system to win. The casino grinds you down with a constant insurmountable house edge. If you have won for 5 years straight using that system, we have a technical term for you in the casino industry. Its: "that lucky little bastard". You are a statistical deviation from the expected result and it will end one day soon.

If anyone is thinking about playing roulette, go for it. You will probably have a great night out, you may win, you may lose on any given night. But realise in the long run you will lose. Dont gamble more than you can afford to lose and remember the enjoyment of the game and the thrill of the outcome are what are important. Again im being a bit harsh but Danny is right. People should not have illusions about what they are getting into.

I had a quick peek at our casino player tracking lists tonight. Of the top 100 regular roulette players we have, guess how many are in positive figures?

Highlight to see:Of course you guessed it: none.

[cyberkim]

Dont select game to play but select people to play and bet against or follow his bet. This is winning strategy

[croup]

To put it succintly, no, no its not. Roulette is a house game. Other players actions have no bearing whatsoever.

[DannyC]

Dont select game to play but select people to play and bet against or follow his bet. This is winning strategy

lmfao, oh it gets worse I see...

[croup]

Oh yes.... im eagerly anticipating the next installment....

[KasinoKing]

Hi! I've just joined this forum & came across this thread - a subject in which I am very interested.

I would like to make a few of points;
Several posts state there is no way to beat roulette long term with any given system. I believe this to be true. (I have run several martingaling simulation programs (i.e. with 1000's of spins) and every time the system fails at some point.

Other posts says online casinos are rigged; I believe this is NOT true (at reputable places). Having established there is no system to beat roulette, there is absolutely no reason for it to be rigged. Long term the casino will make 2.7% (single zero version) no matter what bets are placed. This is a mathematical certainty.

However... Saying that after 10 reds have dropped does not make black more likely is slightly misconstrued. For the sake of argument, lets use a roulette wheel with no zeros: True, the odds of Black or Red on any given spin is always the same at 50/50, but the probability of 11 reds in a row is (1 in 2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2) = 1 in 2,048 = not terribly likely.
If anyone disputes this, please come to my place with a coin. If you can toss 10 heads or 10 tails in a row I'll give you 50 quid, and every time you fail to toss 10 in a row you give me just one quid. Any takers... :mrgreen:
This is the point of the martingaling system - you are not just betting that the 11th spin on it's own will be a different colour to the previous 10 (if all the same), but you are betting against 11 spins in a row being the same.

Having said that - back to point 1) No system is guaranteed to work consistently - the wheels will come off at some point (pun intended!).
I always remember one occasion in a casino in Brighton when I watched Red drop in no less than 21 times in a row!

As stated in a post about half way up - there is only one way to win; Play any system or set of random numbers you like and when you get lucky and are ahead, quit, walk away & come back another time.
The difficult bit is doing this every time! 8)

Good luck & take care!

[jjh]

Hi! I've just joined this forum & came across this thread - a subject in which I am very interested.

I would like to make a few of points;
Several posts state there is no way to beat roulette long term with any given system. I believe this to be true. (I have run several martingaling simulation programs (i.e. with 1000's of spins) and every time the system fails at some point.

Other posts says online casinos are rigged; I believe this is NOT true (at reputable places). Having established there is no system to beat roulette, there is absolutely no reason for it to be rigged. Long term the casino will make 2.7% (single zero version) no matter what bets are placed. This is a mathematical certainty.

However... Saying that after 10 reds have dropped does not make black more likely is slightly misconstrued. For the sake of argument, lets use a roulette wheel with no zeros: True, the odds of Black or Red on any given spin is always the same at 50/50, but the probability of 11 reds in a row is (1 in 2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2) = 1 in 2,048 = not terribly likely.
If anyone disputes this, please come to my place with a coin. If you can toss 10 heads or 10 tails in a row I'll give you 50 quid, and every time you fail to toss 10 in a row you give me just one quid. Any takers... :mrgreen:
This is the point of the martingaling system - you are not just betting that the 11th spin on it's own will be a different colour to the previous 10 (if all the same), but you are betting against 11 spins in a row being the same.

Having said that - back to point 1) No system is guaranteed to work consistently - the wheels will come off at some point (pun intended!).
I always remember one occasion in a casino in Brighton when I watched Red drop in no less than 21 times in a row!

As stated in a post about half way up - there is only one way to win; Play any system or set of random numbers you like and when you get lucky and are ahead, quit, walk away & come back another time.
The difficult bit is doing this every time! 8)

Good luck & take care!

Hi there. Good post

Although knowing the probability means nothing because you've seen 21 reds in a row yourself, so the system will always fail at some point, you just don't know when!