Do people never learn..
Your time would be much better spent working on some physics or maths problem. The roulette wheel is random and therefore its a waste of time trying to find a way around the house edge.
Add me to facebook!
My Facebook
![]()
Roulette is unbeatable unless you have either a crystal ball or a good cheating method.
unbeatable [un beétab’l]
adj
too good to surpass: too good or favourable to be beaten or surpassed
![]()
Beating roulette is impossible.
impossible
adj
1. not possible: that cannot exist or cannot be done
an impossible task
2. too difficult: very difficult to deal with and apparently without a solution
Hope this helps![]()
Impossible is the wrong term John, what If I played 2 spins on roulette in my whole entire life, and win on both spins and never play again. Was 100% possible then![]()
Job Centre Plus LondonAdvertise with Job Centre Plus London
Job Centre Plus UK WebsiteFor jobs in your area visit the Job Centre Online
Uber-Networks: 10 years in the making...Web,Print,Graphic Design, Development, Programming, Project Management and Audio/Video Production. All in one place.Web Design in Lancashire
Originally Posted by Dice Man
Why would you bother testing a 1000 or more spins!!!Originally Posted by RouletteMastered
ITS RANDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!!
True Danny, you got me there!Originally Posted by DannyC
But we all know I was referring to the longterm, as was Roulette MasteredIn which case, 'Impossible' is possible.
No one is suggesting Roulette is impossible to win on.. I my self have many a times enjoyed hitting a number with a tenner one it
What is impossible is beating it mathematically, the house edge cannot be over come with any combination of betting.. hell I dont think its even possible to place a no-lose no-win bet...
Add me to facebook!
My Facebook
Ok. So when i started this thread the system I wanted tested was poor. I tried it.
But I decided maybe the best system is playing one number for 35 spins then increasing the bet for the next 35.
So i chose the Zero for this. As I think 0 will come out more often as the roulette software assumes the zero will make them profit.
but, we all know you can go maybe 70+ spins with out seeing a zero.
So my idea was to find a way to play the Zero at £1 a spin for 35 spins, but to find a way to stretch the 35 spins to a possible 40 or 50.
Im not sure if any one has tried this before but I have done it.
I can play £1 on Zero every spin and go for 40+ spins before i total £35 spent.
Now in my eyes this increses my chances of hitting a Zero and making a profit before i go £35 down.
Please give me your views on this and odds if you have them.
If you can not work out how i am doing this then i will tell you in 7 days from now. If you work it out PM me and i will confirm if the same technique.
Im pleased with it.
I know this is a gambling forum were we discuss gambling methods and strategies but you're just fooling yourself if you think a system is going to make you money on roulette.Originally Posted by RouletteMastered
'The software makes zero come out more to make profit?' The thing is, the built in house edge means they don't have to control anything, as they're making money off you. You're trying to beat a game where the odds are not in your favour and NEVER will be.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)