Now I have started getting up relatively early I have re-joined the BBC Breakfast club, and haven't been able to help noticing how hot the female newscaster is, Susanna Reid. Check out this video:
YouTube - Susanna Reid - Pokies Tight Silver Blouse 30 Sep 09 (HQ)
I remember seeing Russell Howard showing a clip on his show on BBC 3 of these two (I think she was wearing the same outfit) and he looked directly at her tits about 15 times. Even when he's not looking at them he looks like he's really struggling not to look at them. Sometimes he makes an exaggerated gesture to look far away from them, like when he has to look over his left shoulder to see the screen he scans by as fast as possible, but really he's in torture because life would be so much better for half a second to have a 21st look at them. Go to 2:55, and he just totally gives up altogether, and at 3:30 he pretty much licks his lips as he's staring at them. Also there is this picture:
I totally could have posted this in the Perfect 10 thread but people are way too critical in there. Given that she's 40 this year and has 3 children I think she definitely qualifies as being right up there. Thoughts? She'd get it up the wrong'un amirite?
Definitely would get my meaty secret inside her.
Originally Posted by TomPich
Good work Dice Man, she would get it - although you were right to post it here, she is not a 10. She looks a lot better with her hair like it is in the photo aswell imo (that could be because she is just in her pants though)
Anyway I am glad you've posted it because I have recently noticed a weather girl on Sky News that is quite fit, after a bit of googling/ogling I have discovered that:
A: Her name is Lisa Burke
B: She is frigid about posing for photos or getting her kit off (there is some sort of glamour model called Brooke Lisa Burke, do not be fooled by this)
Anyway this is the best I could find, probably not a 10 either but at least an 8 I say:
Sky News | About us | Biography
YouTube - Lisa Burke - Sky News Weather 12.03.06
![]()
She is easy 9. In fact if I were going to decimals I would make her about 9.3. I think we need a discussion about how these x/10 ratings are made. I rarely give ratings under 4. I reserve those for old or clearly ugly women. Plain women I'd give 5 too. I would say about 10% of the female population of the UK between the ages of 16 and 30 are 8+, and 1% are 9+. So IMO there are a huge amount of 9+s out there, and I know quite a few of them too (just from having met 100 women, plus most of those were students who are probably more correlated with 9dom than non-students). So it doesn't surprise me at all that women who get jobs on the TV are easy 9s. That would almost be a condition of the job. I don't even disagree with your policy of there being no such thing as a perfect 10 either. For the 0.1 scale I would say that about 0.01% of UK women between 16 and 30 are 9.9+s, i.e. 1 in 10,000, so there's probably 1000 of them in the UK (probably none in Swindon). As for the perfect 10 thread, I would say that all the women I submitted were 9.9+s (it's possible to argue that they are 9.99+s, about 1 in a million, but I won't argue that), and probably all the pictures provided by other users were at least 9s. The average must have been about 9.7 I imagine. My scale is exponential, so when you get to 9 I reckon only 1% of the 9s are 9.9s and only 1% of the 9.9s are 9.99s and so on. I think that's fair.
So what sort of theory are you trying to implement whereby that weather girl is only "at least an 8"?
lol Well, I just thought she was nice and wanted to focus on her rather than the numbers so I said "at least an 8" so we could all agree on that. Imo she is 9+ but Tyler for example likes stick thin, flat-chested, ginger girls so he might not agree with the 9+ assessment.
Why do you think students are more likely to be 9+?! Surely in general intelligence = ugliness?! (Which is why I'm so thick)
Intelligence = ugliness? Erm no I don't think those two have ever been correlated in any culture. Pretty much every positive characteristic will be correlated together. In general intelligence is highly correlated with health which is highly correlated with attractiveness. Students are wealthier than non-students too, and that's also highly correlated with health.
I can see what you mean if you only include the super-intelligent (i.e. the nerd stereotype), but they're only a tiny subset of all those intelligent enough to become students. I suppose the super-intelligent might be correlated with ugliness because they lack social skills, sympathy and are motivated more with knowledge so direct their resources elsewhere than trying to be attractive.
Whoah whoah whoah. They dont have to be stick thin, and I love a pair of tits as much as the next feller. BUT smooth pale skin and red hair and a nice arse is worth more than tits imo. Redheads just have the best skin if theyre a Hot redhead. Redheads will either be a 9.5+ or a 3.
Originally Posted by TomPich
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)